A mountain with two peaks is seen in in the distance. In the foreground, a muddy tideland at low tide with a large rock on the beach.

Unlock full content

When people learn I’m a consultant, conversation often proceeds to problems and problem-solving. It’s true that I only get hired well after there is a problem. Typically a problem that has gotten so lousy that nobody wants to deal with it and it has therefore become worth the trouble—of spending time, money, effort, and reputation—to bring in somebody to sort it out.

That said, I like completeness. What other responses do I notice to problems? (Other than solving them.) I don’t know that any of these are universally good or bad. But I do see people having three additional responses, and acting based on them. These are:

Solving problems (the first response we think of)

Pushing problems around

Preserving problems

Promoting new problems

Let’s look at each of these three ‘P’s in turn.

No. 0001. Pushing problems around

When I was facilitating staff-led continuous improvement projects, this was the common outcome. Making things better here by making them worse there. This is what most problem-solving in medium and large organizations look like, because this is what local optimization looks like. This is fine, in a certain sense, and a huge waste of time, in another. A key point is to not blame people for pushing problems around. They’re playing the game in front of them, and playing to win. Instead, when you see this happening, look for their boss’s boss and fix the incentives and system view there.

No. 0002. Preserving problems

Clay Shirky wrote, in part of a 2010 blog post that is no longer online:

Kevin Kelly named it ‘The Shirky Principle’ and wrote, also in 2010:

wrote

A very easy thing to look for when there’s a problem are the people who depend on it. Who’d lose out if the problem were solved? You don’t have to agree with these people—the ones who preserve the very problems you’re working to eliminate. But you had better know who they are and include them in your plan.

No. 0003. Promoting new problems

Always ask this. It’s one of Neil Postman’s six questions about technology (from a 1998 lecture):

from a 1998 lecture

Jerry Weinberg wrote in one of his books:

in one of his books

In my own practice, the primary way of dispelling this illusion is to get a good diagram going so that everybody can see their problems, agree on what they are, and pick a few that are actually worth fixing. More on that soon.

Read Next